Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Energy Subsidies and Urban Consumption in Ecuador: Distortions and Pathways for Transition

Subsidios energéticos y comportamiento de consumo urbano en Ecuador: distorsiones y alternativas para una transición




Section
EFICIENCIA ENERGÉTICA

How to Cite
Energy Subsidies and Urban Consumption in Ecuador: Distortions and Pathways for Transition. (2026). Revista Técnica "energía", 22(2), PP. 122-135. https://doi.org/10.37116/revistaenergia.v22.n2.2026.742

Dimensions
PlumX

How to Cite

Energy Subsidies and Urban Consumption in Ecuador: Distortions and Pathways for Transition. (2026). Revista Técnica "energía", 22(2), PP. 122-135. https://doi.org/10.37116/revistaenergia.v22.n2.2026.742

Download Citation

Gabriela Araujo
Andrés Robalino

Similar Articles

1-10 of 487

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Since the 1970s, energy subsidies in Ecuador have sought to guarantee universal access, but they have distorted urban consumption by fostering inefficiency, dependence on fossil fuels, and inequality. This study examines how artificially low prices have discouraged clean technologies and hindered energy efficiency, particularly affecting the urban residential sector. Using a bottom‑up approach, tariff sensitivity is evaluated through segmentation models with 16 and 7 variables, applying independence tests to identify significant redistributions. The results reveal structural stability in energy profiles, which supports the proposal of a gradual transition toward more rational pricing, accompanied by targeted policies, eco‑innovation, and compensation for the most vulnerable, as a pathway to a more sustainable, equitable, and fiscally responsible energy matrix.


Article visits 8 | PDF visits 3


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. [1] S. Espinoza and V. Guayanlema, “Balance y proyecciones del sistema de subsidios energéticos en Ecuador,” *Análisis*, pp. 1–28, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/quito/13648.pdf
  2. [2] R. Jiménez and A. Yépez-García, “Understanding the Drivers of Household Energy Spending: Micro Evidence for Latin America,” *IDB Publ.*, Working Paper, vol. 805, pp. 1–40, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://ideas.repec.org/s/idb/brikps.html
  3. [3] Ministry of Energy and Mines, “Balance Energético Nacional 2023,” 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.036
  4. [4] G. Araujo-Vizuete, A. Robalino-López, and Á. Mena-Nieto, “Looking beyond subsidies: Understanding the complexity of household energy consumption dynamics of Ecuador’s main cities,” *Cities*, vol. 163, Apr. 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2025.106008
  5. [5] G. Araujo, A. Robalino-López, and J. L. Román, “Propuesta de modelo teórico referente al comportamiento de consumo energético del sector residencial urbano ecuatoriano,” in *Responsabilidad Social y Sostenibilidad: Disrupción e Innovación ante el Cambio de Época*, 2021, pp. 611–634.
  6. [6] G. Araujo-Vizuete, A. Robalino-López, and Á. Mena-Nieto, “Decoding urban energy use variability: A bottom-up approach in Ecuador,” *Energy*, vol. 327, May 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136459
  7. [7] G. Araujo-Vizuete and A. Robalino-López, “Aportes desde el enfoque analítico: Consumo energético del sector residencial del Ecuador,” *Rev. Gestão e Secr.*, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 6275–6294, 2023. doi: http://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i4.2050
  8. [8] MEER, “Plan Maestro de Electricidad 2016-2025,” Quito, 2016.
  9. [9] C. F. Gould, S. B. Schlesinger, E. Molina, M. L. Bejarano, A. Valarezo, and D. W. Jack, “Household fuel mixes in peri-urban and rural Ecuador: Explaining the context of LPG, patterns of continued firewood use, and the challenges of induction cooking,” *Energy Policy*, vol. 136, Sep. 2019, p. 111053, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111053
  10. [10] M. Villavicencio and M. Ruiz, “Efecto de eliminar subsidio al gas para uso doméstico en el Ecuador,” *RECUS*, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 29–34, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7368629.pdf
  11. [11] F. Schaffitzel, M. Jakob, R. Soria, A. Vogt-schilb, and H. Ward, “¿Pueden las transferencias del gobierno hacer que la reforma de los subsidios energéticos sea socialmente aceptable? Un estudio de caso sobre Ecuador,” *Banco Interam. Desarro.*, p. 25, 2019.
  12. [12] EP Petroecuador, “Informe estadístico. Enero - Diciembre 2021,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.eppetroecuador.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2022/03/INFORME-ESTADISTICO-ENERO-DICIEMBRE-2021.pdf
  13. [13] World Bank, “International Prices of Petroleum Derivatives: Gasoline and Diesel,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EP.PMP.DESL.CD?locations=EC-CO-PE-1W
  14. [14] Ministry of Energy and Mines, “El precio de la gasolina súper se regulará de acuerdo a su valor en el mercado,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.recursosyenergia.gob.ec/el-precio-de-la-gasolina-super-se-regulara-de-acuerdo-a-su-valor-en-el-mercado/
  15. [15] Ministry of Energy and Mines, “El 11 de julio rige nuevo mecanismo de fijación de precios de combustibles,” Jul. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.recursosyenergia.gob.ec/el-11-de-julio-rige-nuevo-mecanismo-de-fijacion-de-precios-de-combustibles/
  16. [16] W. Glad, “Everyday Governance of Domestic Energy Systems,” *Procedia Eng.*, vol. 180, pp. 1612–1621, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.324
  17. [17] M. Csutora, A. Zsoka, and G. Harangozo, “The Grounded Survey – An integrative mixed method for scrutinizing household energy behavior,” *Ecol. Econ.*, vol. 182, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106907
  18. [18] N. Iliopoulos, M. Onuki, and M. Esteban, “Shedding light on the factors that influence residential demand response in Japan,” *Energies*, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1–23, 2021. doi: 10.3390/en14102795
  19. [19] G. Shippee, “Energy consumption and conservation psychology: A review and conceptual analysis,” *Environ. Manage.*, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 297–314, 1980. doi: 10.1007/BF01869423
  20. [20] G. Araujo-Vizuete and A. Robalino-López, “A Systematic Roadmap for Energy Transition: Bridging Governance and Community Engagement in Ecuador,” *Smart Cities*, vol. 8, no. 80, 2025. doi: https://www.mdpi.com/2624-6511/8/3/80
  21. [21] FMI, “Energy Subsidy Reform—Lessons and Implications,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/climate-change/energy-subsidies
  22. [22] A. Pelfini, G. Fulquet, and A. Beling, *La energía de los emergentes: innovación y cooperación para la promoción de energías renovables en el Sur Global*. Buenos Aires: Teseo, 2012.
  23. [23] A. Florini and B. K. Sovacool, “Who governs energy? The challenges facing global energy governance,” *Energy Policy*, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 5239–5248, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.039
  24. [24] B. K. Sovacool, “An international comparison of four polycentric approaches to climate and energy governance,” *Energy Policy*, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 3832–3844, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.014
  25. [25] A. Faiers, M. Cook, and C. Neame, “Towards a contemporary approach for understanding consumer behaviour in the context of domestic energy use,” *Energy Policy*, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 4381–4390, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.003
  26. [26] A. Sohre and I. Schubert, “The how and what of bottom-up governance to change household energy consumption behaviour,” *Energy Res. Soc. Sci.*, vol. 89, Aug. 2021, p. 102570, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102570
  27. [27] V. Međugorac and G. Schuitema, “Why is bottom-up more acceptable than top-down? A study on collective psychological ownership and place-technology fit in the Irish Midlands,” *Energy Res. Soc. Sci.*, vol. 96, Feb. 2023, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102924
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.9